10 Misconceptions about Nature Recordings
Jan 21st, 2009 by andrew skeoch
Recording the sounds of nature is an unusual occupation, and we often find that people misunderstand the nature of our work.
Here are our Top Ten popular misconceptions about nature recordings!

Nature recordings…
1. …are just birdy noises
Well yes, plus insects, frogs, animals, the elements…
Our ancestors knew their place in the world by listening to nature. Scientists speculate that in the distant past, humans first learned to sing by listening to birdsong, and then refined that into spoken languages.
So what have we lost when nature seems just a meaningless background noise? Perhaps we can learn again to appreciate the music of nature – after all, to fully enjoy jazz, classical or any art music, we have to spend time and learn about it.
The more I listen to the natural world, the more complex and marvelous I find it. Not only does each species have its unique songs, some of them extraordinary, but the whole symphony of nature is finely crafted. All the sounds fit together like an orchestra, creating a music that changes continually throughout the day, responding to the weather, and from season to season. Every habitat sounds unique, every place in the world singing its own songs.
The musicality of nature, once heard, will delight you for life.
2. …are new-age
I can understand people thinking this. For the last 30 years, music companies have been pumping out ‘nature CDs’ because they sell (let’s face it, anything will if it’s priced low enough). We’ve heard some truly appalling stuff. Those stories about making a ‘rainforest waterfall’ by recording a bathroom tap? Or taking one bird sample and just looping it in the studio? True. Those kinds of crappy CDs are out there.
Which is a shame, because it not only degrades the work of skilled recordists, but it trivialises nature. Nature is dynamic and alive, and if a recording captures that, you will fall in love with what you hear, rather than move on when you’ve had your fix.
3. …are boring
Pardon? Is our marvelous, living planet boring someone? If nature isn’t interesting, what on earth is?

Nature is universal. Nature is essential to life. There are many ways of connecting with nature, and listening is one of the most enjoyable. The more you listen, the more you will hear. Every one of our recordings is full of diversity and activity. Just grab a pair of headphones and listen for how many species you can hear calling at any one time.
Boredom has been described as a lack of engagement. We reckon that if someone finds nature boring, they’re just not really listening!
4. …are good because one day these species and habitats will be extinct
You’d be surprised how often we are told that our recordings are great because “one day we won’t be able to hear these sounds any more”.
We find this attitude shocking, really disturbing. It expresses an undertone of resignation to the inevitability of extinction. It is a kind of warped affirmation. The more we shock and numb ourselves with the concept of extinction, the more familiar and accepting of it we become.
It also implies that humanity will continue normally as nature collapses around us. That might happen in a Hollywood movie, but in reality, it is actually humanity that is in peril now. Nature is adapting, we’re not.
Our recordings may be useful scientific documents in the future, but that is not why we publish them. We do it because we want to share and inspire. Voyeuring on extinction isn’t a part of our vision.
5. …aren’t sexy
Are you kidding? Why do birds sing? They want to attract a mate! “Come on, let’s fluff some feathers!” Frogs too, and insects, animals… Our nature recordings are full of sex!
But we know – our recordings aren’t the latest hip, cool thing. We’re talking fashion here aren’t we? Which raises the question; is nature really unfashionable? Sadly, that may be true in the mainstream of our culture, and the new-age’s ‘romanticising’ of nature doesn’t help.
We guess our customers must have grown beyond the tyranny of fashion, because for them our recordings really are ‘cool’… Perhaps even a little sexy!
6. …are easy, anyone can make a nature recording
Yep, and anyone can play the guitar too, or piano, or tuba… Like playing a musical instrument, sound recording in the wild is a wonderful pastime. We heartily encourage you to grab a microphone and get out there! You’ll discover a lot more about the natural world than you thought.
You’ll probably also discover that making good recordings takes more than just good equipment; it requires skill, persistence, field experience and a fair dose of luck.
In some instances, it also requires a bit of courage. There have been many times in Asia I have walked alone through dense forest in the pre-dawn darkness, to get on location before the dawn chorus. Bumping into an elephant in such circumstances is not a good idea. On one occasion I found out how quickly I could dump 10kg of expensive sound recording gear and run, when a king cobra slid across the path ahead of me.
7. …are a bit creepy
![]() |
Its funny, but people who find our recordings a little scary are not usually concerned about elephants or king cobras. They’re thinking bugs. Flies zipping past the microphones seem to inspire images of dark jungles full of creepy-crawlies.
I feel this is largely a fear of the unknown, or at least unfamiliar. The more time I spend in jungles, the more amazing I find them, and the more comfortable I am to be there.
One of the most relaxing experiences of my life was to be in a tropical rainforest in the depth of night. All I could hear was insects chirruping all around me. It was hypnotic, mesmerising, and after a few hours in pitch blackness, I was floating. You can listen to what I heard on our ‘A Walk in the Rainforest’ album, and as you do, think bliss not bugs.
8. …are nice and relaxing
Well, yes, listening to nature sounds is very soothing on the nerves. But to think of nature as only ‘relaxing’ is to limit our emotional responses. Some birdsong is exhilarating, electric, it sends thrills up the spine. The calls of big Woodpeckers in Asia could not be called relaxing listening. The sound of Hornbills flying overhead is awesome. Tawny-crowned Honeyeater song can be sublimely beautiful, and as I’ve mentioned, a chorus of nocturnal insects deeply meditative.
Life is more than just relaxing, and you will find all your emotions reflected in your response to nature.
9. …all sound the same
Really? Purchase more than one of our albums. Compare them, spot the differences. Better still, go out into a wild place, sit and listen as different birds and animals come and go, and sounds change throughout the day. Listen to the vocalisations of one species, and learn its repertoire of calls and songs.
The more you listen, the more you’ll hear…
10. …are a replacement for the real thing
We reckon our nature recordings are very enjoyable. If you are meditating at home and want to create a more natural environment, or travel to work immersed in the sounds of a rainforest, then they are great. With headphones on and your eyes closed, you can easily imagine being out there.

But our recordings can never replace your experience of being in nature. We hope though, that the next time you are out there enjoying the morning birdsong, your album listening will prepare you to hear so much more.

|
Established in 1993 by nature sound recordist Andrew Skeoch and photographer Sarah Koschak, Listening Earth offers a range of beautiful nature sound recordings from around the world.
"Our albums feature only the sounds of nature as you would hear in the wild - no music or other distractions. Recorded in often remote and pristine locations, they bring you the relaxing and beautiful sounds of our living planet. Listen, and let our recordings take you there."


I enjoy a good rainstorm, or heavy breeze, or natural sounds of birds, bugs, etc.
Most nature recordings that I’ve come across (including many here as well) strive to give a variety of bird sounds or other things that “stand out”. You say it yourself, “Some birdsong is exhilarating, electric, it sends thrills up the spine. The calls of big Woodpeckers in Asia could not be called relaxing listening.”
A few hours of babbling brook, without the close-up squawk of a bird that suddenly punctuates the calm, would be better when I’m reading a book, or falling asleep.
I’m do enjoy “In a Sheltered Valley”, though there are a few “closeups” that I could do without. Sometimes I play it on a loop and it would be better without those highlights that almost start to become too predictable. (Am I making sense?)
Your recordings are ALL wonderful. I wouldn’t mind (and would pay for!) some extended recordings of solid backgrounds of outdoor ambiance that doesn’t vary every five or ten minutes into something different, or have startling highlights. Full 1 hour (or even two or three hour tracks), so that if I put it on repeat I don’t start recognizing patterns in my background noise, would be terrific.
I’ve just entered the yahoo group Nature Recorders and followed the link on a posting of yours. I really liked “let’s fluff some feathers”, you’re right, birds, frogs and other animals sing to attract mates, only humans do this for money (greedy species, eh?). Anyway I liked your site, beautiful pictures and great content. I’m working with something similar, also about recording nature, but for identifying species.
Hi,
I wanted to say I like your website, and as I am on a slow connection hear in Tanzania I still wating to here some of your recordings which I sure are great. I have been recording bushbabies and other animals in E Africa for some time as a scientific tool to identify species – even new ones. Its amazing how bioacoustics are undarvalued as a research tool, but this is rapidly changing. When I play my recordings to poeple they are just blown away by what sounds animals can make. So now I am working on a website and some commercial possibilities which I hope might support research and conservation here. I have mainly been using ‘cheap’ gear PMD660 (also because it talkes few batteries) with a K6-ME67 mic as I try to isolate the animals, but now I want to move into recording the animal’s sound scape to add context, so I was very interested to see your stereo setup and I wondered how I could buy it. Maybe I also need to upgrade the 660 to. Anyway great site – the photography side to (which I also dable in). Andrew Perkin, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
I’m an Australian, from Armidale NSW, living and working in Harrismith, Free State province, South Africa. Your 10 misconceptions and responses are spot on. For myself I’m not a fan of long tracks of uninterrupted ambient nature sounds – I tend to lose concentration and it becomes generic natural background. The more species I can recognise, the more I know about their ecology, the more I appreciate them and their environment. Each place becomes more special; the sound and feel of a particular forest rather than “forest” in general. I like your focus on particular species and reasonably long tracks without voice over. I also like that you have plenty of background calls, which you don’t highlight.
Well done Andrew & Sarah, …I appreciate your very professional web site, and the audio and photographs it represents. I’m an Aussie from SA & have done some traveling & love the bush, sounds & scenery. I once experienced pre dawn surround sound Dingoes calling each other in central Queensland, maybe 6-7 of them, and that was memorable, if only I could have recorded it. Your work is absolutly brilliant, hope to see you on the track one day.
Dear Andrew & Sarah,
I just want to applaud when I read this post ! A must-read for all beginners and confirmed recordists.
The 4th point (“we document sounds of animals for the future generation who won’t have our chance”) is especially the weirdest opinion I’ve often heard from some experienced nature recordists. Nature recording is for immediate sharing : open the ears to what exists around us, protect it and enjoy its presence.
Thanks for this text and your excellent sound work.
All the best,
Yannick
Hi Andrew and Sarah,
Good to read your list of misconceptions about nature sound recording. I am not a recordist myself, but have written on the topic as a journalist of music. The World Forum for Acoustic Ecology holds a modest online sampling of the texts that I wrote. Here are two that might be relevant to you (the “ecord” in the second hyperlink is their typo – it’ll take you to the piece without any problem):
http://wfae.proscenia.net/library/articles/van_peer_nature_record_1.pdf
http://wfae.proscenia.net/library/articles/van_peer_nature_ecord_2.pdf
Yours, Rene
This is a very fascinating post, I have only recently been getting an interest in nature recording mainly because I’m hoping to work as a field recordist for film and television one day. I’ve lived in the desert city of Dubai all my life and it feels pretty nice to escape from all the city life with nature sounds every now and again, I hope I could create my own collection of recordings one day, once I leave this place.